The democracy-liberalism tension is negotiable, not fatal to either regime.

Evidence

To be sure. contrary to what adversaries like Carl Schmitt have argued, this docs not mean that liberal democracy is a doomed regime. Such a tension, though ineradicable. can be negotiated in different ways. Indeed. a great part of democratic politics is precisely about the negotiation of that paradox and the articulation of precarious solutions. What is misguided is the search for a final rational resolution. Not only can it not succeed, but moreover it leads to putting undue constraints on the political debate. — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 427

Categorization

  • XREF: This is the pivotal move that splits Mouffe from Schmitt while inheriting his critique — relevant to the reader testing whether a non-exclusionary pluralist ‘we’ avoids Schmitt’s friend/enemy conclusion. — connects to: The tension between liberal rights and democratic sovereignty is ineradicable yet negotiable, not fatal — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 426; Liberal democracy’s liberal-democratic tension is a paradox, not a fatal contradiction — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 53; Liberalism and democracy are only contingently articulated, not necessarily linked — Ernesto Laclau, On Populist Reason, 332 (+3 more)

Broader Connections