Colonialism brought material progress to the Third World.

Evidence

Brunner refuted the claim that foreign aid to the Third World could be viewed as a form of restitution for the West’s historical sins, since colonization had brought significant material progress to the Third World: “Justification of the NIEO in terms of an established ‘right’ based on ‘past exploitation’ should eventually be recognized as a theme without support in reality. It remains, however, a powerful ideological weapon to lure the support of a gullible western intelligentsia for the persistent raids on the wealth of western nations” (Brunner 1996a, 152). — Philip Mirowski & Dieter Plehwe (eds.), The Road from Mont Pèlerin, 1767

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Brunner’s empirical claim that colonization brought material progress deserves scrutiny against development economics scholarship.
  • XREF: connects to: Neoliberal economists inverted colonial extraction into a source of Third World progress — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market: Human Rights…, 401; The doctrine of progress makes colonialism appear natural rather than impositive — Wael Hallaq, Restating Orientalism: A Critique of…, 217; Colonialism created the conditions for modern capitalism’s emergence — Nick Couldry & Ulises A. Mejias, The Costs of Connection: How Data Is…, 251 (+4 more)

Broader Connections