Colonial dissidents were punished for accusing officials of condoning planter atrocities

Evidence

Valck writes to Norman Levyssohn with frustration, despair, and indigna- tion. But each of those sentiments are tempered by his ambivalence about how much he wants the ā€œfactsā€ about European atrocities communicated and to whom. Aware that his observations and actions would leave him open to criticism, he worries that his story would be deemed suspect and not believed. His assessment is not off the mark. He boldly contradicted the most cherished claim of the trading companies, plantation firms, and gov- ernment authorities: that Deli was flourishing, that plantation profits were secure despite the Aceh War, and that both planters and coolies were ā€œin hand.ā€ But it was his oblique if unmistakable reference to ā€œleniency pur- sued for years towards the plantersā€ that sealed his fate. — Ann Laura Stoler, Along the Archival Grain_ Epistemic…, 1103

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

Broader Connections