Colonial Catholic pedagogical rules bounded corporal punishment but practice exceeded them

Evidence

The correction was bounded: the Third Mexican Provincial Council of 1585 explicitly limited physical punishment of indigenous students to cases of “grave fault” and prohibited “excessive” correction. … The Third Mexican Provincial Council’s language — “drawn to Christ through love rather than driven to Him through fear” — echoes the Chrysostom framework Episode 44 documented and the al-Ghazālī framework Episode 47 documented. The operational gap between the Council’s aspirational language and the parish-school practice across three centuries of colonial rule is, as in every other context this series has documented, significant. — , The Rod and the Child, 4950

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly parallels Episode 64’s colonial African mission-school practice and the universal ‘operational gap’ theme across the series. — connects to: Imperial examination design rewarded gentle engaged pedagogy over corporal correction — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 1922; Institutional structures, not ideology, determined severity of corporal practice — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 2235; Rabbinic tradition is structurally biased against applying severe corporal punishments — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 2438 (+23 more)

Broader Connections