Classroom success depends on collective community, not individual learning or teacher control

Evidence

Last semester, I had a class where when I finished I was walking on air. It had been a great class. The students left realizing that they didn’t have to think like me, that I wasn’t there to reproduce myself. They left with a sense of engagement, with a sense of themselves as critical thinkers, excited about intellectual activity. The semester before that, I had this class that I just hated. I hated it so bad I didn’t want to get up in the morning and go to it. I couldn’t even sleep at night, because I hated it so much I feared that I would sleep through it. And it was an 8:00 A.M. class. It didn’t work. One of the things that fascinated me about that experience is that we failed to create a learning community in the classroom. That did not mean that individual students didn’t learn a great deal, but in terms of creating a communal context for learning, it was a failure. That failure was heartbreaking for me. It was hard to accept that I was not able to control the direction our classroom was moving in. I would think, “What can I do? And what could I have done?” And I kept reminding myself that I couldn’t do it alone, that forty other people were also in there. — bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress, 314

Categorization

  • XREF: Concrete example of the dependence between teacher-student collective agency hooks theorizes throughout the book; echoes her teaching-against-the-grain failures theme. — connects to: Classroom freedom is co-created by teachers and students together. — bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress: Education as…, 293; Classroom excitement arises from collective recognition, not professorial charisma — bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress: Education as…, 25; Community, not safety, is the right frame for radical classroom learning — bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress: Education as…, 88 (+6 more)

Broader Connections