Classical social theory defined modernity by the application of scientific rationality over tradition

Evidence

Modernity came to be conceived of as the society in which the Enlightenment project is realized, in which the scientific understand­ ing of the human and physical worlds regulates social interaction. Saint-Simon, influenced by Condorcet’s theory of history, thought of the industrial society whose emergence he anticipated in precisely these terms. The great social theorists of the turn of the nineteenth century did not share Condorcet’s and Saint-Simon’s optimism about the future, but all saw contemporary society as shaped by the practical application of the kinds of concepts and theoretical proce­ dures involved in the seventeenth-century scientific revolution. Va­ rious vocabularies — Weber’s distinction between traditional and rational-bureaucratic forms of domination, Durkheim’s between mechanical and organic solidarity, Tonnies’s between Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft — were used to draw a broad contrast between two fundamentally different forms of social organization, separated above all by the dissolving and dynamizing effect of modern scientific rationality and its practical realizations. — Alex Callinicos, Against Postmodernism, 151

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines modernity as the realization of the Enlightenment project via scientific rationality, contrasted against tradition across Weber, Durkheim, and Tonnies.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Alex Callinicos, Against Postmodernism: A Marxist…, 151
  • XREF: connects to: Weber’s rationalization theory defines modernization as differentiation plus instrumental rationality — Alex Callinicos, Against Postmodernism: A Marxist…, 153; Modernity’s reflexivity makes its own rational grounds ultimately puzzling — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 124; Modernity’s self-image as rational depends on denying its own tacit metaphysics (+13 more)

Broader Connections