Christian doctrine institutionalized women’s subordination despite early egalitarian impulses

Evidence

Christian ideology played no little role in women’s oppression. Without a doubt, there is a breath of charity in the Gospels that spread to women as well as to lepers; poor people, slaves, and women are the ones who adhere most passionately to the new law. In the very early days of Christianity, women who submitted to the yoke of the Church were relatively respected; they testified along with men as martyrs; but they could nonetheless worship only in secondary roles; deaconesses were authorized only to do lay work: caring for the sick or helping the poor. And although marriage is considered an institution demanding mutual fidelity, it seems clear that the wife must be totally subordinate to the husband: through Saint Paul the fiercely antifeminist Jewish tradition is affirmed. — Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex, 204

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the ‘Complaints About Immodesty Go Way Back’ article on religious moral panics, and to the treatment of the flesh/Roman asceticism in earlier chapters of this same book. — connects to: Early Buddhism excluded cripples, women, and debtors and reinforced existing hierarchies; Fromm read Christian doctrine shifts as products of socioeconomic change — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination: A History
, 327; Biblical-era women were property bound to male kin and taboo-burdened (+30 more)
  • QUESTION: Beauvoir asserts Paul transmitted a ‘fiercely antifeminist Jewish tradition’ — worth chasing whether that framing holds up against current scholarship on Paul’s Corinthian and Galatian communities.

Broader Connections