Christian doctrine alone did not produce medieval classroom harshness

Evidence

The same Christian tradition, in different institutional settings, produced measurably different operational practices. The variability is itself evidence that the doctrine — original sin, the inherited stain, the need for the cane — did not, by itself, produce the harshness of the medieval classroom. The doctrine combined with specific institutional conditions to produce harshness. Different institutional conditions, with the same doctrine, produced restraint. — , The Rod and the Child, 1712

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Worth chasing: which institutional variables — class composition, relational duration, community oversight — most robustly predict restraint across other traditions?
  • XREF: connects to: Christian pedagogical cruelty was doctrinally contingent, not theologically fixed — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 2866; Doctrinal texts are post-hoc justifications for structural causes of corporal punishment, not causes themselves — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 4203; Doctrine alone does not change behavior without enforcement and transmission — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 4011

Broader Connections