Censoring bigotry makes opponents complacent and shirks the work of countering it.

Evidence

The consequence of challenging bigotry through censorship also leads ‘anti-racists into a false comfort zone, where it feels like the basic arguments against prejudice no longer need to be put’, as the journalist Paul Mason (2014) has put it. It helps absolve us, in other words, of the responsibility of tackling such ideas openly and robustly. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 680

Categorization

  • SEED: An essay angle: the argument that speech restrictions are not merely ineffective but actively self-undermining for progressives, because they replace the ongoing labor of persuasion with a one-off legal prohibition.
  • XREF: connects to: Giving up the right to offend forfeits the power to challenge injustice. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 661; Bigoted speech should be countered morally and politically, not legally. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 671; Denying a bigotry’s existence enables it to spread unchecked (+3 more)

Broader Connections