Categorization that grounds prejudice is normal and unavoidable mental functioning.

Evidence

Although ingroup–outgroup distinctions had been previously recognized as a source of bias (Sumner, 1906), Allport focused on the normality and inevitability of categorizing social groups. Allport noted, “The human mind must think with the aid of categories… . Once formed, categories are the basis for normal prejudgment. We cannot possibly avoid this process. Orderly living depends upon it” (p. 20). — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 107 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

In titling his chapter 2 “The Normality of Prejudgment,” Allport sparked a revolution; humans have a normal, natural propensity toward prejudgment. Whereas most social-scientific observers had viewed prejudice as the product of complex psychodynamics, Allport provided an alternative. Even now, most lay people believe prejudice is the purview of a disfavored few, those with abnormal impulses. Instead, Allport suggested, all people are subject to prejudices, as a function of the normal human cognitive apparatus. — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice, 285 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Social categorization is a normal, inevitable mental process underlying prejudice — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 107; Prejudice arises from normal cognition, not abnormal pathology — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 282; All people harbor prejudice as a normal cognitive function — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 285 (+10 more)

Broader Connections