Capitalist development required the active re-education and moralization of working-class culture

Evidence

There is no separate, autonomous, “authentic” layer of working-class culture to be found. Much of the most immediate forms of popular recreation, for example, are saturated by popular imperialism. Could we expect otherwise? How could we explain, and what would we do with the idea of, the culture of a dominated class which, despite its complex interior formations and differentiations, stood in a very particular relation to a major restructuring of capital; which itself stood in a peculiar relation to the rest of the world; a people bound by the most complex ties to a changing set of material relations and conditions; who managed somehow to construct “a culture” which remained untouched by the most powerful dominant ideology—popular imperialism? Especially when that ideology—belying its name—was directed as much at them as it was at Britain’s changing position in a world capitalist expansion? — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 997 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Capitalism reproduces itself by drawing civil and cultural life into conformity with its needs; Capitalism’s reproduction requires family, education, and media apparatuses; Capitalism requires continuous re-education of the popular classes through cultural struggle (+13 more)

Broader Connections