Campus repression of Palestine speech is asymmetric since endorsing Israel faces no comparable suppression.

Evidence

[C]ontrary to the pervasive ā€œboth sidesā€ framing of rising antisemitism and Islamophobia, this repressive wave is plainly asymmetric: there is no comparable institutional effort to suppress endorsements of the current Israeli state, despite its commitments to ā€œJewish supremacyā€ (as Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem and others describe it) and ongoing commission of war crimes like collective punishment of Gazans (even setting aside the ā€œgenocideā€ question). The ubiquitous justification offered for this stark asymmetry is that calls for Palestinian freedom constitute threats of antisemitic violence against Jews in Israel and the U.S. alike. — Evelyn Alsultany, Antisemitism and Islamophobia The…, 27

Categorization

  • XREF: Echoes broader critiques of ā€˜both sides’ framing in media and institutional coverage of the Israel-Palestine conflict. — connects to: Public anti-Islamophobia stances can function as a cover for pro-Israel politics — Evelyn Alsultany, Antisemitism and Islamophobia The…, 35; Official anti-hate strategies functioned as cover for US arms to Israel — Evelyn Alsultany, Antisemitism and Islamophobia The…, 31; The Ground Zero mosque controversy grew from an organized pro-Israel campus campaign. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 526 (+3 more)

Broader Connections