Bureaucratic consolidation language masqueraded reform as accountability while enabling concentrated power

Evidence

In those 5,200 words—and in other sections of the 22,000-word “Summary of Recommendations” with which the report began—was distilled the essence of the philosophy of Progressivism in general and the Bureau of Municipal Research in particular. It was all there, the bywords which New York’s reformers had been chanting for twenty years—“executive budget,” “longer terms,” “consolidation,” “responsibility,” “commensurate power”—the incantation, like a drum roll underlying the chant, of “efficiency and economy,” the idealistic belief that citizen knowledge of the intricacies of government and participation in those intricacies was the panacea for democracy. — Robert A. Caro, The Power Broker, 457

Categorization

  • XREF: Sets up Caro’s central irony — the consolidation rhetoric that built Moses — which connects to later chapters on unaccountable authority. — connects to: Bureaucratic reorganization can mask continuing obstruction of accountability — Albert Bandura, Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm…, 526; Bureaucratic centralism signals a ruling group hardening into a narrow clique — Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 777; Bureaucratic interpretations become autonomous and resistant to change in late capitalism — Mark Fisher, Capitalist Realism: Is There No…, 101 (+2 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: Caro names the core self-deception: efficiency-and-economy consolidation framed as democratic accountability but structurally creating the very concentration later exploited.

Broader Connections