Buddhist tradition has a consistent anti-coercive pedagogical ethic

Evidence

The doctrinal resources for a Buddhist children’s-rights position are extensive and coherent. The Burning House father. The Lam Rim Chen Mo’s compassionate guru. The kōan tradition’s anti-coercive logic. Sulak’s structural Five Precepts. Ariyaratne’s brahmavihārā child pedagogy. Thich Nhat Hanh’s Peace Treaty. The tradition has generated, across two and a half millennia, a remarkably consistent pedagogical ethic: the teacher’s task is to find the adaptive, non-coercive address that reaches the student. Force is not only ethically prohibited. It is pedagogically incoherent. — , The Rod and the Child, 4006

Categorization

  • XREF: Synthesizes the chapter’s doctrinal thread; connects to the broader series arc of doctrine vs. transmission. — connects to: Non-corporal pedagogy is a four-thousand-year-old recovery, not modern import — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 2272; Buddhist doctrine has not measurably reduced corporal punishment in Mahāyāna countries — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 3956; Unmediated honesty without adaptation counts as pedagogical negligence — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 3934 (+9 more)

Broader Connections