British Muslim women fail to achieve expected returns on education due to employment discrimination
Evidence
Researchers argue that British Muslim women are not achieving the ‘return on education’ that they anticipate (Social Mobility Commission 2016). Another study by the Social Mobility Commission (2017) focused specifically on social mobility for young Muslims. The researchers conducted in-depth focus groups and interviews exploring young Muslims’ perceptions and experiences of education and searching for jobs. The analysis of data underlined the experience of discrimination in the job application process, especially when applicants had names that identified them as members of an ethnic or religious minority, or wore a headscarf. The interviews also highlighted that in-work cultural insensitivity, stereotyping and indirect racism were common. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 281
Categorization
- XREF: Connects to the reader’s broader interest in how discrimination claims are empirically evidenced in the definitional contest over Islamophobia — here via labour-market outcomes rather than attitude surveys, a rival evidentiary mode to Bleich’s neutral concept-formation. — connects to: Muslim employment shortfalls persist even after controlling for time in education. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 231; Higher education rates fail to translate into employment parity for British Muslims — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 258; Visible Muslim identity measurably worsens job-market outcomes in Britain. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 304 (+4 more)
Related
- Higher education rates fail to translate into employment parity for British Muslims (similarity 0.87)
- Visible Muslim identity measurably worsens job-market outcomes in Britain. (similarity 0.84)
- Muslim women must conceal religious identity markers to secure employment in hostile climates (similarity 0.83)
- Wearing a headscarf more than triples hiring discrimination for qualified women. (similarity 0.82)
- Muslim employment shortfalls persist even after controlling for time in education. (similarity 0.81)
- Visibly Muslim markers like the headscarf trigger added discrimination in hiring (similarity 0.81)
- Muslim labour market disadvantage persists into second generations, signalling discrimination beyond human capital. (similarity 0.80)
- Muslim employment gaps persist beyond what full-time education explains (similarity 0.80)
- Human capital and social networks only partially explain Muslim employment gaps. (similarity 0.79)
- Anticipated discrimination deters Muslims from entering hostile job sectors (similarity 0.79)
Broader Connections
- Visible Muslim identity measurably worsens job-market outcomes in Britain.
#corroborates(0.92) — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 304 - Muslim employment gaps persist beyond what full-time education explains
#expands(0.88) — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia, 226 - Visibly Muslim markers like the headscarf trigger added discrimination in hiring
#exemplifies(0.85) — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia, 281 - Muslim women must conceal religious identity markers to secure employment in hostile climates
#qualifies(0.80) — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia, 376 - Gendered Islamophobia names discrimination targeting Muslim women
#expands(0.78)