Awareness of a stereotype, not belief in it, impairs performance

Evidence

Stereotype threat is a psychological predicament that occurs when people are aware of the negative stereotypes that others hold of their social group and are anxious that they may confirm them, either in their own or others’ eyes. This anxiety, in turn, may interfere with their performance. It is not necessary that a person endorse the stereotype for stereotype threat to occur, or for it to impair performance. Importantly, stereotype threat is a situation-specific predicament, rather than a personality trait. It is experienced only in situations where a negative stereotype is relevant. Thus, a member of a minority group may perform badly on an intelligence test when stereotypes are salient, but not when stereotypes are not (see Steele et al., 2002, for a review). — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice, 938

Stereotype threat is a psychological predicament that occurs when people are aware of the negative stereotypes that others hold of their social group and are anxious that they may confirm them, either in their own or others’ eyes. This anxiety, in turn, may interfere with their performance. It is not necessary that a person endorse the stereotype for stereotype threat to occur, or for it to impair performance. Importantly, stereotype threat is a situation-specific predicament, rather than a personality trait. It is experienced only in situations where a negative stereotype is relevant. Thus, a member of a minority group may perform badly on an intelligence test when stereotypes are salient, but not when stereotypes are not (see Steele et al., 2002, for a review). — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 938

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Canonical definition of stereotype threat with the key clarifying point that endorsement is unnecessary.
  • XREF: Connects to stereotype threat research by Steele and Aronson; also resonates with impostor-syndrome literature where awareness alone shapes performance.
  • QUESTION: A reversal worth chasing: situation-specific framing invites reinterpreting cross-situational consistency evidence that Allport-era trait models took as fixed.
  • corroborated: 4 independent passages support this claim — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years…, 938; , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 938