Australian statutes list allied race concepts without defining their relationship to ā€˜race’.

Evidence

As in other common law jurisdictions, the meaning of ā€˜race’ has not been defined clearly in Australian law. The statutes only refer to what Rees, Rice, and Allen (2018) describe as ā€˜cognate’ or ā€˜allied concepts’ (231) such as colour, descent, ethnic origin and national origin, which are either listed alongside race or said to be ā€˜included’ in ā€˜race’. Since 1994, the NSW legislation additionally lists ā€˜ethno-religious origin’, a term also used in Tasmania. However, none of these terms is further defined. Moreover, the relationship between ā€˜race’ and these ā€˜cognate’ or ā€˜allied’ concepts is unclear, and there is little guidance on whether they overlap with race or are distinct from it or whether ā€˜race’ acts as an ā€˜umbrella term’ encompassing all other terms (Rees, Rice, and Allen 2018, 232). — Mareike Riedel, Islamophobia, Racial Discrimination…, 28

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Race as a legal category is left undefined in statutes. — Mareike Riedel, Islamophobia, Racial Discrimination…, 15; States can assert racial projects without ever naming race explicitly — David Theo Goldberg, John Solomos, A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, 1718; NSW law denied Muslims race protection absent linkage to a specific ethnic origin — Mareike Riedel, Islamophobia, Racial Discrimination…, 50 (+3 more)

Broader Connections