Augustine’s original-sin doctrine suppressed the Pauline no-provoke framework in Western practice

Evidence

Beginning in the late fourth and fifth centuries, the Latin Christian tradition under Augustine’s increasing influence shifted away from the substantive engagement with the Pauline “do not provoke” framework and toward the framework we read about in Season One Episode 22 (Tertullian) and Episode 9 (Augustine). The doctrine of original sin — Adam’s transgression transmitted to all subsequent humans, including infants and children — created theological pressure that substantively reduced the operational force of the “do not provoke” passages. If children are constituted by inherited Adamic sin requiring redemptive corporal correction, then “do not provoke to wrath” becomes a secondary constraint within a broader framework that prioritizes correction. — , The Rod and the Child, 2772

Categorization

  • XREF: Explicitly ties to Season One Episodes 9 and 22 and implements the book’s larger thesis about doctrinal frames driving pedagogy. — connects to: Eastern Orthodoxy sustained the no-provoke tradition that the West abandoned — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 2776; Original sin theology committed Christianity to the cane for salvation — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 583; Augustine interpreted his school beatings as inherited punishment for Adam’s sin — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 681 (+4 more)

Broader Connections