Original sin theology committed Christianity to the cane for salvation

Evidence

The Augustinian doctrine — that children are born sinful and the rod is the route to driving the sin out — was, by the time Quintilian came back to Europe in 1416, fifteen hundred years old and thoroughly entrenched in Christian theology, Christian liturgy, Christian school practice, and Christian parenting culture. The doctrine had its own scriptural proof-texts (Proverbs, in mistranslation), its own theological apparatus (Augustine, Aquinas), its own ritual authority (the centrality of baptism in removing the inherited stain). Quintilian’s secular Roman case against the cane had no purchase on a Christian theological infrastructure that was committed to the cane as a means of salvation. You cannot persuade a doctrine purely on pedagogical grounds if the doctrine is not, fundamentally, a pedagogical doctrine. It is a soteriological one. The cane is for the soul. — , The Rod and the Child, 583

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to earlier episodes on Augustine and monastic rod practice (Pachomius, Episode 23), and to the general thesis that soteriological doctrine overrode pedagogical evidence. — connects to: Ambrose produced the earliest Christian argument linking original sin to corporal punishment — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 1638; Augustine’s original-sin doctrine suppressed the Pauline no-provoke framework in Western practice — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 2772