Atheist counts are distorted by social-desirability pressures in both directions

Evidence

Admittedly, counting atheists is notoriously difficult. In deeply religious societies, the numbers are likely underestimates, as atheists are unwilling to reveal their lack of belief. Conversely, in officially atheistic societies such as China, they may be overestimated, as cultural norms push people to mask their religiosity and falsely claim to be atheists. There are also issues of semantics—what does it mean to be an atheist? Should we count those who say they are agnostics and nonbelievers? Should we include in our definition people who do not believe in God but nevertheless attend religious services, such as many secular Jews? Should we include people who say they do not believe in God but are “cultural Christians,” such as many Danes and Swedes? Is opposition to religion an important part of the definition? — Norenzayan, Ara, Big gods - how religion transformed
, 242

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

  • DEFINE: Clarifies the definitional ambiguity of ‘atheist’ — central to the reader’s analytical argument about belief signaling.
  • XREF: The masking pressure on both sides shows belief as a costly, socially-loaded signal — exactly the mechanism the fumi-e targets.