Asymmetric pulse shapes amplify polarity sensitivity beyond symmetric pulses

Evidence

The mean across subjects was ‑1.4, ‑3.1, ‑5.3 and ‑2.3 dB for SYM, RPS, RPS-IPG and TRI, respectively. Paired-sample t-tests with Bonferroni correction showed that this effect was larger for RPS than for SYM (t(8) = 3.6, p < 0.05) and also for RPS-IPG than for SYM (t(9) = 3.7, p < 0.05). — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 2295

Categorization

• corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 2295
• XREF: connects to: Asymmetric pulse shapes with long delayed phases are more electrically efficient than symmetric pulses; Pulse polarity effects on neural response differ significantly across pulse shapes; Combining varied pulses and effects yields unusual polyrhythmic textures — Pauline Oliveros, Deep Listening, 281 (+1 more)

Broader Connections

• Asymmetric pulse shapes with long delayed phases are more electrically efficient than symmetric pulses #expands (0.85)
• Pulse polarity effects on neural response differ significantly across pulse shapes #expands (0.80)
• Neural degeneration does not increase polarity sensitivity following deafening #complicates (0.80) — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 2311
• Combining varied pulses and effects yields unusual polyrhythmic textures #expands (0.70) — Pauline Oliveros, Deep Listening, 281