Artistic categories for Bloch become modes of Utopian realization at the ontological level

Evidence

In this context the various techniques or categories of the work of art take on their ultimate meaning only when their analysis is pursued as far as the ontological level itself, where they become transparent as modes of Utopian realization: “Art is at one and the same time a laboratory and a carnival of possibilities brought to fulfillment.” — Fredric Jameson, Marxism and Form, 290

Categorization

  • XREF: Bloch’s ‘laboratory and carnival of possibilities’ directly connects to Jameson’s Frankfurt-school project of a Utopian hermeneutic — the ontological reading of aesthetic categories as the core method he is demonstrating throughout. — connects to: The Utopian impulse is structurally allegorical because its object can never be imagined directly — Fredric Jameson, Marxism and Form, 274; Schiller’s utopian synthesis of naive and sentimental art remained mere costume drama; Bloch’s philosophy is an open encyclopedic exploration of hope across every domain — Fredric Jameson, Marxism and Form, 240 (+14 more)
  • DEFINE: Defines Bloch’s core move: pushing formal/categorical analysis to the ontological level where technique becomes Utopian realization.

Broader Connections