Any social group can act as individual or aggregate depending on its relational frame.

Evidence

It is always precisely the intermediate structure that exhibits the pattern in question—internal cohesion, external repulsion—when contrasted with a more general higher structure and a more individual lower structure. The latter is a relative individual in relation to the former, regardless of whether in relation to still others it is a collective structure. Thus, wherever one seeks, as we do here, the normal correlation between three levels that are distinguished by their magnitudes—between the primarily individual element, and the narrower and the wider circle—there one will find that under different circumstances one and the same complex can play all three roles, depending on the relationships into which it enters. — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 631

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Establishes the formal, level-relative definition of ‘individual’ vs ‘collective’ that the whole chapter’s correlation rests on.
  • XREF: connects to: A set of individuals can be society to varying degrees. — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 51; Social forms can be classified by the interpersonal distances they create — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 81; Sociology’s proper object is the forms relating two or more individuals — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 154 (+2 more)

Broader Connections