Anticolonial and civil-rights movements pursued complementary goals against overlapping racial structures

Evidence

Both anticolonial and civil rights mobilizations need to be viewed, then, as vigorous, influential, and effective antiracist movements. Anticolonialism, of course, was principally directed at effecting national independence while the civil rights movement was aimed first and foremost at national integration. Both nevertheless sought to undo the histories of racially ordered social structures, legal enforcements, group-driven exclusions, conceptual colonialisms, and racially indexed foreshortened lives in the metropoles as much as in the colonies. Both sought to ā€œdecolonize the imaginationā€ and to ā€œprovincialize Europeā€ (which is also to say to deprovincialize what is not European). In this, they sought to strip from the racially subjugated the imposition of infantilizing and demeaning self-conceptions, with varying degrees of success and less dramatic transformative influence on the imaginaries of the oppressing classes. — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race, 98

Categorization

  • XREF: The claim that these movements changed dominated groups’ self-conceptions far more than the oppressors’ imaginaries parallels the reader’s contact/institution gap — a one-sided awareness change is relevant to testing where privilege-threat mobilization does or does not update. — connects to: Anticolonial and US civil rights struggles form one interconnected antiracist mobilization. — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 90; American antiracists and anticolonial activists shared organized networks from 1911 onward. — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 93; Anticolonialism and civil rights shared core antiracist aims despite different targets — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 98 (+11 more)

Broader Connections