Anti-Sharia legislation spikes in pre-election years to mobilize conservative voters.

Evidence

To prove that anti-Sharia legislation is directly tied to moneyed right-wing American political movements, the University of California-Berkeley’s Haas Institute further highlighted the fact that the majority of anti-Sharia legislations in recent history were introduced in calendar years prior to midterm and/ or presidential election cycles (to ensure turnout from conservative Republican voters). For example, they showed that fifty-six anti-Sharia bills were introduced in 2011, thirty-five bills were introduced in 2013, and thirty-five bills were introduced in 2015. By contrast, fourteen, twenty-five, fifteen, and fourteen anti-Sharia bills were introduced in the election years of 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016, respectively. — Arsalan Iftikhar, Fear of a Muslim Planet_ Global…, 634

Categorization

  • XREF: Electoral-cycle-driven scapegoating echoes the moral-panic machinery in Cohen and the fear-driven politics Iftikhar traces globally. — connects to: Anti-Sharia initiatives function like anti-gay marriage initiatives as a GOP wedge issue — Arsalan Iftikhar, Fear of a Muslim Planet_ Global…, 602; Anti-sharia panic manufactures political support while Muslims pose no such threat; Islamophobic campaign rhetoric is traded for votes and converted into policy — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding…, 57 (+5 more)
  • SEED: Angle: legislative rhythm as electoral infrastructure — chart the pre-election year spike as a predictable pattern.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Arsalan Iftikhar, Fear of a Muslim Planet_ Global…, 634

Broader Connections