Anti-discrimination policy justified barring private carrier-shipper agreements that vary from filed tariffs.

Evidence

The Supreme Court also interpreted the tariff provisions as taking away the power of carrier and shipper to make special agreements with different provisions. The Court reasoned that the purpose to prevent discrimination would be defeated if any other view were taken. — Henry M. Hart, Jr. and Albert M. Sacks, The Legal Process, 3947

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Government trade terms function as optional facilities that private parties may adopt or replace — Henry M. Hart, Jr. and Albert M. Sacks, The Legal Process: Basic Problems in…, 1110