Allport described ambivalent competence-warmth outgroup stereotypes despite defining prejudice as antipathy

Evidence

Although Allport primarily focused on prejudice as antipathy (the low– low cluster), he also emphasized love prejudice for the ingroup (the high– high cluster). And (despite his equation of prejudice with antipathy) he was aware of the ambivalence toward certain outgroups on competence and warmth dimensions (see his chapter 12): Jews were viewed as intelligent and hard-working, but not socially acceptable, whereas blacks were characterized as lazy and impulsive, but fun-loving and sexual. — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 325

Categorization

• ADDENDUM: Directly feeds the Allport reassessment thread: shows Allport himself already noticed the ambivalent stereotype clusters his own antipathy definition excluded.
• corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 325