All later South African resistance debates trace to Paerl’s 1788 revolt questions

Evidence

In initiating collective resistance politics in the southern African theater, Paerl’s performance prompted a number of considerations traces of which would later come to haunt all debates about collective resistance in South Africa: how far to refuse engagement with the totalizing and ultimately destructive state institutions regarded as thoroughly racist and so unmitigatedly unjust; whether violence and armed struggle are the appropriate responses to racist institutional violence; whether race-conscious or nonracial politics are the most viable modes of resistance to racist social arrangements, in terms of effectivity or ethicality; whether a politics of self-determining secession and unilateral declaration of independence guarantees self-protection and self-promotion more robustly than the messy politics of heterogeneous racial interactivity; how religiously driven resistance preconceives the wrongs to be resisted, structures the horizon of possible outcomes, shapes the imagined community to come, orders the after-life of liberation, and conditions affective responses; and, finally, it signals both the potentially generative and probably debilitating implications of charismatic leadership, following, and fellowship for the longer-term success of collective resistance movements. — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race, 1381

Categorization

  • XREF: Mirrors the reader’s contact/institution tension — ā€˜messy politics of heterogeneous racial interactivity’ vs ā€˜self-determining secession’ — the core dilemma animating the research interest. — connects to: A single 1788 Khoi revolt prefigured every later debate on South African resistance; Khoi resistance predating Paerl was individual rather than collective — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 1380; Gandhi’s South African years shaped his views on race and caste. — Ambedkar, B R, Annihilation of Caste_ The Annotated…, 183 (+2 more)
  • SEED: The catalogue of resistance quandaries (race-conscious vs nonracial, engagement vs refusal, charismatic leadership costs) could anchor an essay generalizing subaltern-strategy debates across settler contexts.

Broader Connections