After 1945 the question shifted from whether to which western nation could commit genocide

Evidence

Remember, again, that the basic question was whether a western nation, a civilized nation, could be capable of such a thing. And then, soon after 1945, we see the query turned around totally as one begins to ask: ‘Is there any western nation that is incapable of it? … In 1941 the Holocaust was not expected and that is the very reason for our subsequent anxieties. We no longer dare to exclude the unimaginable. — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 570

Categorization

  • XREF: Hilberg’s inversion of the civilization question feeds the Islamophobia readings on moral panic and the imagined vulnerability of Western societies. — connects to: Early silent compliance precluded later resistance to genocide — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 216; Conditions enabling genocide remain while absolute-state deployment grows less likely — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 654; Westerners disbelieved the Rohingya genocide because of their high opinion of Suu Kyi — Arsalan Iftikhar, Fear of a Muslim Planet_ Global…, 144 (+2 more)

Broader Connections