African scholars collectively refute the colonial denial of African philosophy.
Evidence
The sum total of these philosophical positions provides an opposing view to the claims made by colonial scholars and philosophers that there is no African philosophy or that Africans are not intelligent enough to couch an African philosophical epistemology. — Frans Dokman, Beyond Bantu Philosophy_…, 904
Categorization
Category: Factual Claims
Related
- African philosophy has been defined more by negation than by positive formulation (similarity 0.88)
- Full African philosophy spans diverse strands traceable from Egyptian Kemet (similarity 0.88)
- African philosophy is both universal inquiry and continentally rooted cultural reflection (similarity 0.87)
- Only Western-educated African intellectuals initially engaged with Bantu Philosophy. (similarity 0.87)
- African philosophy reduces to the relation between man, world and God (similarity 0.87)
- African philosophy must reshape the very idea of philosophy, not fit a Western template (similarity 0.87)
- Bantu Philosophy’s historical lesson outweighs its philosophical lesson (similarity 0.86)
- African philosophy is broader than Western philosophy because it includes the West. (similarity 0.86)
- European philosophical prejudice against Africa persists in subtle contemporary forms (similarity 0.86)
- The debate over African philosophy asks who is entitled to write it (similarity 0.86)
- Western conclusions about African philosophy rest on presumptions lacking lived African realities (similarity 0.86)
- Philosophies fixating on African singularity cannot liberate Africans. (similarity 0.86)
- African philosophy may encompass Western philosophy as a subset in its scope (similarity 0.86)
- Africa lacks a philosophical tradition because it never broke cleanly with colonialism. (similarity 0.86)
- Bantu Philosophy emerged from European perceptions and African resistance to Christianity (similarity 0.86)