Accusations carry more rhetorical force in disputes than denials do

Evidence

It is in the nature of disputes that a forceful accusation by an injured party often has more rhetorical power than a denial. Partly for that reason the opening statements—the denials, as it were—made on behalf of W. R. Grace and Beatrice Foods struck many observers in the gallery as anticlimactic. — , Harr Jonathan - A Civil Action, 1709

Categorization

  • SEED: A piece on the asymmetry of accusation and denial — why ‘you killed my children’ cannot be answered, and what that means for defamation law, politics, and personal feuds.
  • CANDY: Neat elevator line: in any fight, the accuser gets to frame reality and the denier just gets to say ‘no.’
  • XREF: connects to: Accusing opponents of ‘sympathy’ is a rhetorical tool for redirecting debate — Evelyn Alsultany, Arabs and Muslims in the Media: Race…, 876; Accusations of suppressed evidence provoke fury in the accused rather than contrition — , Harr Jonathan - A Civil Action , 2931; Justifiers abandon one rationale for another when accusations strain credibility — Albert Bandura, Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm…, 2240 (+11 more)

Broader Connections