Absolute Knowledge gains form only through a particular philosophical subjectivity

Evidence

The responsibility for this final and definitive formulation (mise en forme) – requiring as it does an idiom, a form of utterance, a discipline of reading – falls to the philosopher. Philosophy’s Self, or absolute subject, would indeed remain formless unless shaped into a style by a particular philosophical subjectivity. In return, it is only Absolute Knowledge which gives philosophical subjectivity its rightful form. Thus speculative hermeneutics must consist of a mutual gift of form, from the Self to the self. — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 1131

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines the mutual gift of form between Absolute Self and individual self — a core statement of plasticity as reciprocal formation.
  • XREF: Echoes how the brain’s plasticity works both ways — experience shapes neural form and neural form shapes experience. — connects to: Absolute Knowledge unites the two directions in which substance and subject transform each other — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 923; Absolute Knowledge requires active interpretation rather than passive contemplation — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 1130; Knowledge is not a property but is the ekstatic being of the For-itself — Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness: An Essay on…, 651 (+5 more)

Broader Connections