A war of position rests on the whole industrial-organisational rear, not just trenches
Related
- War of position is the only struggle form possible in stable class equilibrium. (similarity 0.86)
- War-of-position politics is the only available political game for the marginalized (similarity 0.81)
- Hegemony must be won before power is seized, not merely imposed by force after (similarity 0.81)
- In advanced industrial states, wars of manoeuvre diminish to tactical rather than strategic roles. (similarity 0.81)
- Ideology can be reconceived as a terrain of struggle, drawing on Gramsci and Laclau. (similarity 0.80)
- World War I shifted French industries toward imperial supply sources (similarity 0.79)
- Army performance depended on officer-men relations more than on Ibrahim’s leadership (similarity 0.79)
- The General Strike emerged spontaneously without a vanguard, from social contradictions. (similarity 0.79)
- Hegemonic rule works through patient strategic struggle rather than frontal assault. (similarity 0.79)
- Ideological scientificality overrides factual reality in totalitarian action (similarity 0.79)
- Totalitarian ideology becomes as untouchable as arithmetic to members. (similarity 0.78)
- Ideological change happens through class struggle, not through ideas alone (similarity 0.78)
- Crises lasting decades reveal incurable structural contradictions that resisting forces work to mend. (similarity 0.78)
- Hegemony builds collective will by articulating differences, not erasing them (similarity 0.78)
- Deindustrialization trapped white working-class towns in decline and pushed men toward war (similarity 0.78)