Hegemonic rule works through patient strategic struggle rather than frontal assault.
Related
- Hegemony must be won before power is seized, not merely imposed by force after (similarity 0.91)
- Hegemony’s thesis absorbs opposition rather than being transcended by it (similarity 0.88)
- Hegemony means tendential balance, not absolute class victory (similarity 0.88)
- Hegemony builds collective will by articulating differences, not erasing them (similarity 0.88)
- Hegemony is a contestable, unstable equilibrium, never permanently secured. (similarity 0.87)
- Hegemony is an unstable equilibrium requiring continuous re-securing. (similarity 0.87)
- A ruling party exercises hegemonic power without formal juridical rule (similarity 0.85)
- Power generates the will of the power-holder rather than serving it (similarity 0.83)
- Hegemonic rule substitutes protracted positional struggle for frontal assault on the state. (similarity 0.82)
- Ideology can be reconceived as a terrain of struggle, drawing on Gramsci and Laclau. (similarity 0.82)
- Dominant powers benefit from engineering their subjects’ inability to trust (similarity 0.82)
- Schooling matters for hegemony because intellectuals depend on it economically (similarity 0.81)
- Nietzsche reduced all ideology to a power struggle between illusions (similarity 0.81)
- War of position is the only struggle form possible in stable class equilibrium. (similarity 0.81)
- Hegemony is forged through cultural and ideological struggle, not just force. (similarity 0.81)