A medieval anti-Islamic text outright fabricated Quranic content.
Evidence
The Contrarietas was guilty of one complete fabrication. This was the interpolation into siirah 11.220 of the words, nec etiam cognoscatis masculos participantes, donec credant. — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 791
Categorization
Category: Factual Claims
Related
- Christian polemicists fabricated outright Qur’anic verses against male homosexuality. (similarity 0.83)
- Medieval Christians claimed the Qur’an was partly invented by forced Jewish and Christian helpers. (similarity 0.82)
- Medieval authors fabricated conversion stories to lend polemics spurious authority (similarity 0.82)
- Medieval Christian authors faked convert status to lend their polemics authority. (similarity 0.81)
- Medieval anti-Islamic polemic read the Qur’an’s own approval of the Bible as self-invalidating (similarity 0.81)
- Medieval Christians saw the Qur’an’s unlikeness to Scripture as its real disproof. (similarity 0.81)
- Medieval Christians read Quranic verses as proving scripture’s incorruptibility (similarity 0.81)
- Medieval polemicists distorted Quranic verses to serve anti-Muslim arguments (similarity 0.80)
- Medieval arguments against Islam hinged on the stable transmission of texts across nations. (similarity 0.80)
- Medieval Christian polemicists attacked Islam with knowingly false evidence (similarity 0.80)
- Medieval anti-Islamic polemic could work from accurate hadith rather than fabricated detail (similarity 0.80)
- Medieval scholars fabricated that Muhammad’s sexual boast was in the Qur’an (similarity 0.80)
- Some medieval authors noted Qur’anic truths without accusing Muhammad of deception (similarity 0.80)
- Medieval apologists may have blurred Qur’anic authority to treat it as human-made (similarity 0.80)
- Medieval Christianity girded its defense of Scripture using the Quran against Islam (similarity 0.80)