Emily M. Bender, Alex Hanna — The AI Con- How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want
22 published claims from this book.
- Access systems interfere with users’ information navigational skills.
- AI development is not an inevitable process dictated by technology or necessity.
- AI does not demonstrate creativity; it merely appropriates human contributions.
- AI hype continues to escalate beyond expectations.
- AI lacks the ability to address deep-rooted social issues effectively.
- AI marketing manipulates perceptions to generate profits, ignoring real harms.
- AI reduces job quality by devaluing human labor.
- AI solutions will not improve access to healthcare as claimed.
- AI systems are using artists’ work without their consent.
- AI tools require hidden labor for data management and content screening.
- Criminality cannot be determined by facial recognition alone.
- Current ideologies in AI reflect historical eugenics concepts.
- Documenting hype contours helps inhibit future tech bubbles.
- Emerging technologies can obscure important social responsibilities.
- Goldman Sachs claims AI could replace 300 million jobs worldwide.
- Hype can mislead public perception of AI technology.
- Language models lack subjectivity and do not understand meaning as humans do.
- Many AI Doomers profit from the dangers they exaggerate.
- Replacing skilled labor with AI can result in harm, not benefit.
- Researchers relied on GPT-4 about labor market impacts, compromising their findings.
- The absence of citational practice in AI undermines recognition of original creators’ contributions.
- The general intelligence project has racist roots affecting societal inequalities.