Wrongdoing requires intentional, knowing, or reckless harm

Evidence

This definition needs qualification, but the moves to qualify it are well understood. Briefly, we need to rule out certain harmful actions, such as unforeseeable accidents, as necessarily morally wrong. So we add to the definition a qualification: a notion of a wrongdoing actor as somehow intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly harming or causing pain to another individual. — John T. Jost and Jim Sidanius, Political Psychology, 3862

Categorization

• corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — John T. Jost and Jim Sidanius, Political Psychology, 3862
• XREF: connects to: Implied malice is a fiction masking the objective standard of criminal liability — Henry M. Hart, Jr. and Albert M. Sacks, The Legal Process: Basic Problems in…, 1658