Within neoliberalism, one’s theory of markets determines one’s definition of freedom

Evidence

Some members of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, like Milton Friedman, have refused to define it altogether (other than to divorce it from democracy), while others like Friedrich Hayek forge links to thesis 2 by motivating it as an epistemic virtue: “the chief aim of freedom is to provide both the opportunity and the inducement to insure the maximum use of knowledge that an individual can accrue.” As this curious definition illustrates, for neoliberals, what you think a market really is seems to determine your view of what liberty means. — Philip Mirowski, Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste, 167

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to Hayek’s knowledge-dispersal epistemology — freedom framed as epistemic, not political. — connects to: Neoliberalism redefines coercion so that no market exchange can ever count as coercive — Philip Mirowski, Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste, 167; Neoliberal ‘freedom’ is internally redefined to mean market autonomy, not political liberty — Philip Mirowski, Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste, 166; Neoliberalism’s social theory is fundamentally epistemological, recoding freedom as instrumental to independent orders (+13 more)

Broader Connections