White male-black female marriage would threaten white patriarchal rule unlike the reverse

Evidence

Explanations as to why marriages between white women and black men are more readily accepted than marriages between white men and black women can be found in patriarchal sexual politics. Since white women represent a powerless group when not allied with powerful white men, their marriage to black men is no great threat to existing white patriarchal rule. In our patriarchal society if a wealthy white woman marries a black man she legally adopts his status. Accordingly a black woman who marries a white man adopts his status; she takes his name and their children are his heirs. Consequently, if a large majority of that small group of white men who dominate decision-making bodies in American society were to marry black women, the foundation of white rule would be threatened. — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and…, 199

Categorization

  • XREF: Echoes the property/status logic of marriage analyzed in earlier feminist works on coverture and in the first chapter’s treatment of black female status. — connects to: Interracial marriage can serve the colored spouse as a bid for deracialization and equality — Frantz Fanon, Constance Farrington, Black skin, white masks, 263; Whites feared legally sanctioned racial mixing of either sex — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and…, 192; White men were encouraged to exploit black women but not marry them — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and…, 193 (+3 more)

Broader Connections