White evangelicals’ embattlement mindset, not hypocrisy, primed them for Trump in 2016

Evidence

REMINISCENT OF THE WANING YEARS of the Reagan administration, conservative evangelicals had struggled to mobilize as the George W. Bush presidency came to an end. But the Religious Right had always thrived on a sense of embattlement, and in that respect, the Obama White House was heaven-sent. Between demographic changes portending an end to “white Christian America,” the apparent erosion of loyalty among young evangelicals, and steady assaults on their conception of religious liberty, white evangelicals perceived clear and present dangers to their very existence. Or at least to their social and political power. Obama’s election had issued a warning call to evangelical leaders. Leaving nothing to chance, they made the most of the moment, working arduously to stoke further fear and resentment. By the end of Obama’s eight years in office, even as the president’s overall approval ratings had been among the highest in recent presidential history, white evangelicals remained his most stalwart critics. Seventy-four percent viewed him unfavorably, compared to 44 percent of Americans generally. Perhaps more importantly, conservative evangelicals had reinvigorated their posture of embattlement. Drastic times would call for drastic measures. When 2016 came around, they were primed for the fight. They just needed the right warrior to lead the charge. — Kristin Kobes Du Mez, Jesus and John Wayne, 558

Categorization

• XREF: Directly serves the reader’s central question — the continuity-not-hypocrisy thesis. Obama’s unfavorability data (74% vs 44%) is a concrete falsifiable claim worth keeping for the reader’s analytical purpose. — connects to: White Christians supported Trump despite his apparent moral violations — Philip S. Gorski and Samuel L. Perry, The Flag and the Cross: White Christian…, 18
• QUESTION: The line ‘working arduously to stoke further fear and resentment’ is a strong causal claim about leadership agency — worth checking whether Du Mez substantiates this with specific leaders’ actions elsewhere.