White elites supported only image-serving racial moderation to protect their business interests

Evidence

For their own reasons, both halves of the new coalition supported a progressive politics centered on economic growth, civic pride, and—to the surprise of outside observers—a moderate pace of racial change. Black Atlantans pressed for desegregation for obvious reasons. Affluent whites, meanwhile, acquiesced to limited changes in hopes of presenting a positive public image for themselves, their city, and, most important, their business interests. — Kevin M. Kruse, White Flight, 89

Categorization

  • XREF: Core to the reader’s thesis: segregation-era elites backed cosmetic progress for public-image and profit reasons, setting up how ‘color-blind’ conservatism later claimed economic justifications. — connects to: White philanthropists recognized only Black leaders could move Black communities — Evelyn Brooks Higginbotham, Righteous Discontent: The Women’s…, 144; Business elites backed racial moderation primarily to protect profits — Kevin M. Kruse, White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of…, 88; Whites supported racial equality only while it cost them nothing personally — John T. Jost and Jim Sidanius, Political Psychology, 3387 (+9 more)

Broader Connections