Where counsel quality is equal, the substance of law decides case outcomes.

Evidence

In terms of legal representation, one-shotters typically tend to be evenly matched, Generally, either both parties have retained counsel or neither has, and they are unlikely to hire an attorney from the elite ranks of the legal profession. Because disparities in the quality of counsel are unlikely to determine the outcome of disputes between one-shotters, the substance of the law may have a decisive effect on the outcome of the case. — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 2270

Categorization

  • DEFINE: ‘One-shotters’ is Galanter’s term for parties who litigate only occasionally, as opposed to repeat players.
  • XREF: Connects directly to Galanter’s party-capability framework, the foundational lens for studying who wins in American civil justice. — connects to: Qualified counsel can determine a criminal trial’s outcome regardless of guilt — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 215; Legal rules decide one-shotter cases because counsel quality is evenly matched — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 1118; Legal outcomes depend on variable choices and value judgments rather than absolutes. — Ruggero J. Aldisert, Agatha D. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers- A Guide to Clear…, 752 (+16 more)

Broader Connections