Digital Mind 🧠

🪵 The Threshold

Web 2.0 ideology diluted hacker radicalism through Silicon Valley orthodoxy.

Properties2
tagsja-picks, xref, causal_relationships, singleton, category/causal-relationships
aliases@marwick_status_2013, loc. 110

4 min read

Web 2.0 ideology diluted hacker radicalism through Silicon Valley orthodoxy.

Evidence

While the Californian Ideology is still widespread in Silicon Valley, the Bay Area’s strong countercultural influence has also, and in equal measure, shaped the contemporary technology scene. Web 2.0 ideology is the child of both Silicon Valley entrepreneurial capitalism and activist subcultures like independent publishing, anti-globalization activism, Burning Man, cyberdelic rave culture, and free and open-source software. These countercultural movements can be hard to detangle. Many anti-corporate activists believed that the consolidation of media companies during the Reagan and Clinton eras created a homogenized, profit-led mass media, resulting in toothless journalism that lacked the muscle to check corporate or government power. During the early web era, dot-com workers built personal homepages in their free time to provide an alternative to mainstream entertainment. In the Web 2.0 age, blogs and Twitter facilitated “citizen journalism,” a bottom-up form of media that was thought to be able to compensate for the shortcomings of mainstream media. Web 2.0 situated itself in allegiance with the countercultural critique of mainstream media, but positioned social technology, rather than protest or political participation, as the solution. The preexisting affinity between West Coast anti-establishment activism and the homebrew ethos of technology culture created a fertile environment for these ideologies to intermingle. This combination of radical activism and business culture created a strain of idealistic techno-determinism that, rather than rejecting mainstream capitalism, embraces it. — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update, 55 (#expands, via linked claim)

These technologies purportedly foretold freedom from traditional media sources, or “Big Media.” They promised the democratization of celebrity and entertainment, new forms of activism, and the potential for open, transparent information of all kinds. Web 2.0 celebrated the adoption of social technologies as a precursor to a better, freer society, and framed the collection and sharing of information as the bedrock of revolution. Any institution that prevented people from accessing information and using cultural products as raw materials for creativity became an obstacle to overcome, through collective action if necessary. — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update, 52 (#expands, via linked claim)

Between the shock of Brexit in June and Donald Trump’s election that fall, elites shed their techno-optimism almost overnight. The internet once promised a golden age of global democratization; now, as the cliché went, reality felt like an episode of Black Mirror. The utopian features of Web 2.0—lifting marginalized voices and extending monetization tools to everyone—ended up powering disinformation operations that catapulted right-wing politicians into office. … The new face of tech was no longer an archetypal West Coast nerd but a Macedonian millennial working with right-wing operatives to enrage voters for cash. — W. David Marx, Blank Space, 486 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Web 2.0’s FOSS-derived politics directly contradicted its entrepreneurial capitalism ethos.; Web 2.0 inherited DIY culture while stripping its radical politics. — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity,…, 96; Web 2.0 severed its DIY lineage by abandoning punk critique of labor (+9 more)

Broader Connections

✉️

Backlinks