Vigilance committees summarily hanged men on flimsy pretexts.

Evidence

When I said I spent last night at Hall’s Gulch there was quite a chorus of exclamations. My host there, they all said, would be “strung” before long. Did I know that a man was “strung” there yesterday? Had I not seen him hanging? He was on the big tree by the house, they said. Certainly, had I know what a ghastly burden that tree bore, I would have encountered the ice and gloom of the gulch rather than have slept there. They then told me a horrid tale of crime and violence. This man had even shocked the morals of the Alma crowd, and had a notice served on him by the vigilants, which had the desired effect, and he migrated to Hall’s Gulch. As the tale runs, the Hall’s Gulch miners were resolved either not to have a groggery or to limit the number of such places, and when this ruffian set one up he was “forewarned.” It seems, however, to have been merely a pretext for getting rid of him, for it was hardly a crime of which even Lynch law could take cognizance. He was overpowered by numbers, and, with circumstances of great horror, was tried and strung on that tree within an hour. — Isabella L. Bird, A Lady’s Life in the Rocky Mountains, 424

Categorization

• ADDENDUM: Directly supports the interests behind ‘On Sacrifice’ — but more precisely it pairs with the reader’s lynching/moral-panic history interests as a Rawls-ian case of ‘stringing’ as extralegal community enforcement.