Victims defending property had to pay blood compensation to their attackers.
Evidence
In the same vein, innocent people who, in the course of protecting their property, wounded or killed armed attackers, found they were expected to pay blood compensation (mag) in the traditional fashion to their assailants. In general, only those who belonged to strong clans and lineages could protect their lives and property successfully. And while compensation was imported into urban life with the clan system, and successfully claimed (by the stronger party) in cases of targeted individual assault, it was obviously not possible to pin responsibility on individuals in the artillery exchanges which frequently broke out in Mogadishu. — I.M. Lewis, I. M. Lewis, A Modern History of the Somali_ Nation…, 649 (
#corroborates, via linked claim)
Categorization
- XREF: connects to: Traditional blood compensation perversely protected attackers who stole property in Mogadishu. — I.M. Lewis, I. M. Lewis, A Modern History of the Somali_ Nation…, 649
Related
- Traditional blood compensation perversely protected attackers who stole property in Mogadishu. (similarity 0.93)
- Blood-compensation liability reform lay at the roots of Somali clan politics (similarity 0.79)
Broader Connections
- Traditional blood compensation perversely protected attackers who stole property in Mogadishu.
#corroborates(0.85) — I.M. Lewis, I. M. Lewis, A Modern History of the Somali_ Nation…, 649