Universal suffrage in capitalist states inevitably produces social-democratic majorities
Evidence
The most serious problem, however, is posed by the laboring and the poor, given their inevitable demand that the social question be addressed with a social state. Notwithstanding their differences, the neoliberals converged in recognizing that representative democracy based on universal suffrage in large capitalist nation-states would inevitably be controlled by the numerically largest class, making social democracy, with its tendentially totalitarian trajectory, inevitable. — Wendy Brown, In the Ruins of Neoliberalism, 102
Categorization
- QUESTION: This is presented as the neoliberals’ own convergence — how strong is the empirical claim that universal suffrage necessarily yields redistributionist majorities? Testable against median-voter literature.
- XREF: connects to: Neoliberalism’s defeat of its own aims produced states yanked by capital and popular zeal — Wendy Brown, In the Ruins of Neoliberalism: The Rise…, 139; Social democracy collapses when no one represents the labouring side — Yanis Varoufakis, Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism, 674; Social-democratic mass politics were a contingent product of specific social conditions. — Anton Jäger, Hyperpolitics: Extreme Politicization…, 253 (+1 more)
Broader Connections
- Social-democratic mass politics were a contingent product of specific social conditions.
#qualifies(0.90) — Anton Jäger, Hyperpolitics, 253 - Social democracy collapses when no one represents the labouring side
#qualifies(0.75) — Yanis Varoufakis, Technofeudalism, 674 - Democracy genuinely threatens capitalist economic priorities, so capitalism is antidemocratic.
#contradicts(0.75) — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism, 372