Unity demands, not royal abuses alone, delayed independence

Evidence

As much as anything, only a felt need for complete unity among the colonies and their delegations at Congress held back a declaration of independence. … β€œAmerica is a great, unwieldy Body,” Adams cautioned. β€œIts Progress must be slow. It is like a large Fleet sailing under Convoy. The fleetest Sailors must wait for the dullest and slowest.” The colonies could only achieve independence together, he believed; Britain would subdue them separately. β€” Edward J. Larson, Declaring Independence, 160

Categorization

  • XREF: Challenges an assumption that the colonists declared whenever grievances mounted; the decisive constraint was inter-colony unity β€” a pragmatic-institutional brake alongside ideological zeal. β€” connects to: A shared enemy alone cannot constitute national unity β€” Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 532; Selfhood and national unity are forged through conflict with a common foe β€” Nadim N. Rouhana and Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian, When Politics Are Sacralized:…, 1194; Sudanese elites early rejected unity with Egypt in favor of independence β€” Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_…, 842
  • recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source

Broader Connections