Unemployment functioned as a deliberate political weapon to weaken labor

Evidence

What some economists today would characterize as a mistake of economic management had clear political advantages. Th e evil of unemployment was not so evil for the longterm survival of exploitation, a principle upon which capital accumulation rested. Unemployment weakened workers’ position, silenced demands for greater economic democracy, and guaranteed lower labor costs … As Cronin put it: “Th e astronomical levels of unemployment in some of the most militant and strike prone industries must have served to lower the expectations of workers and erode the bases of workshop organization” … Indeed, technocrats got what they wished for: wages fell tremendously as a consequence of the austerityinduced slump. Average money wages and retail prices plummeted by 30 percent between 1920 and 1923, a remarkable degree of fl exibility (Peden 1985, 68). — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order, 994

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: The proposition that unemployment was not a policy mistake but served the political purpose of weakening labor is the analytical core distinguishing austerity-as-class-weapon from austerity-as-technical-error.
  • XREF: Directly echoes the reader’s stated frame — austerity as class weapon from interwar Britain — and connects to modern neoliberal arguments treating unemployment as a necessary inflation-fighting tool. — connects to: U.S. officials viewed unemployment as a deliberate worker-discipline tool. — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism, 18; Central banks trigger recessions to enforce workers’ acceptance of wage labor. — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism, 39; Poverty and unemployment function as deliberate system solutions, not failures — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism, 159 (+23 more)

Broader Connections