Trump’s foreign policy abandoned the bipartisan liberal-hegemony consensus for unilateral nationalist imperialism.

Evidence

In a nutshell, illiberal hegemony translated into a policy of aggressive unilateralism and the abandonment of multilateral organizations, treaties, and economic pacts through which the United States had dominated the world. It was neoconservatism on steroids combined with Trump’s transactional approach to deal making. This marked a break with the bipartisan strategy of liberal or benevolent hegemony that the political class had pursued since the Cold War. Moreover, the multicultural and feminist imperialism of the post–Cold War era was replaced by white nationalism. Until the Trump administration, both parties were committed to the US state superintending global capitalism behind the veneer of benevolence. Their goal was to integrate the world’s states into a so-called rules-based neoliberal order of free trade globalization and to prevent the rise of any peer competitor or rival alliance of states. In place of this bipartisan consensus, Trump implemented a toxic combination of economic nationalism, unilateral imperialism, and a transactional relationship with all states in the world system. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 514

Categorization

Category: Definitional Content

  • DEFINE: Concrete definition of ‘illiberal hegemony’ as unilateralism plus transactional deal-making, contrasted against the prior liberal-hegemony consensus.
  • XREF: Connects to arguments about how ‘rules-based international order’ rhetoric masks superpower control — relevant to imperial-state theory in Milgrom and other institutional readings.

Broader Connections