Tribal political beliefs function as identity markers validated by repetition, not evidence

Evidence

A tribal belief is akin to Boston Red Sox fans’ belief that the “Yankees suck.” Such an assertion is not an affirmation of a proposition that is meant to correspond to facts in the world. Even if the Yankees were the best team in the world, for Red Sox fans, the statement “Yankees suck” remains valid because it reflects fans’ identification with their team and each other. With respect to the Yankees, the question of justified belief does not arise for Red Sox fans, at least not in a philosophic or scientific way. It arises from a tribal context, where validation comes from repetition by those in the relevant community—in this case, Red Sox Nation. — Russell Muirhead and Nancy L. Rosenblum, A Lot of People Are Saying, 126

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Clarifies what a ‘tribal belief’ means through the Red Sox analogy — belief as affiliation badge rather than factual assertion.
  • XREF: Connects to the ‘true enough’ and social capital literature — belief as group-membership signaling, echoing Coleman on closure and reputation. — connects to: Political expression is switched on and off by group context rather than individual belief — Nina Eliasoph, “Close to home”: The work of avoiding
, 97; Political identity is learned, not an innate hidden self — Stuart Hall, Essential Essays, Volume 2: Identity
, 241; Repeated stereotypes create interpretive frames that filter out disconfirming evidence — Carl W. Ernst, Islamophobia in America_ The Anatomy of
, 94 (+5 more)

Broader Connections